Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Particle Size Measurements in Ultra-thin Pd Vapor Deposits: Comparison between Temperature Programmed Desorption (TPD) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Due to a lack of z-sensitivity, standard high resolution transmission electron microscopy has been unable, so far, to determine the full 3-diniensional shape of small (less than 3 nm in diameter) metal particles supported on planar oxide carriers. The projected average particle size is often the only parameter that can be reliably deduced from standard electron micrographs, and below -1 nm even this becomes very questionable because of image interferences caused by the background structure of the support. Also, great care must be taken when interpreting TEM information because of possible damages of the sample either by electron radiation, well documented by Poppa et al. [1], or exposure to atmospheric pressure during the transfer of the sample from the preparation chamber to the microscope. Therefore, an alternative UHV-compatible technique which allows for in situ particle size estimation is most desirable. Chemisorption of a probe gas like CO followed by temperature programmed desorption is certainly the simplest method since it gives a measure of the percentage of metal exposed, E, which can be directly related to a characteristic dimension of the particle. This characteristic length is a function of particle shape. In some cases [1], the analysis of TPD peak shapes can also supply additional information about the crystallographic shape of metal particles; only in exceptional cases can similar information be obtained directly by specialized TEM techniques (profile-TEM). The usefulness of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for particle size determination [2] has also been investigated but the relationship between measured quantities and particle size is much more complex and still controversial.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Desorption Induced by Sub-picosecond Laser Pulses: NO/Pd (111)

J.A. Prybyla, T.F. Heinz, J.A. Misewich, M.M.T. Loy, and J.H. Glownia
MB2 Microphysics of Surfaces, Beams, and Adsorbates (MSBA) 1989

Desorption of NO/Pd(111) induced by subpicosecond laser pulses: internal energy distributions

J. A. PRYBYLA, TONY F. HEINZ, J. A. MISEWICH, M. M. T. LOY, and J. H. GLOWNIA
THNN3 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference (CLEO:FS) 1989

Electron Beam Induced Film Deposition

Shinji Matsui, Toshinari Ichihashi, and Masanobu Mito
TuA1 Microphysics of Surfaces, Beams, and Adsorbates (MSBA) 1989

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.